Claude Code Plugin · v1.0

Thinking Habit

Discover how you think — not how well, but the shape and texture of your cognition.
5 dimensions, 137 papers, one profile that makes AI adapt to you.

How It Works

A 5-phase pipeline from discovery to persistent adaptation

0

Check Profile

Look for an existing cognitive profile in memory. If found, offer to keep it or retake the questionnaire.

1

Questionnaire

15 scenario-based questions across 5 sections. Choose what you actually do, not what you wish you did.

2

Deepening

Adaptive follow-up questions for ambiguous or tied results. Confirms the dominant value for each dimension.

3

Scoring & Gap

Score each dimension, identify the D1↔D4 gap, and compute compensatory strategies for information loss.

4

Save to Memory

Persist the full profile so Claude adapts all future responses to your cognitive style automatically.

The 5 Dimensions

Five independent axes that map how your cognition works

D1

Cognitive Channel

What you think with — the internal substrate of your cognition

Verbal Visuo-spatial Somatic Auditory Abstract
D2

Strategy

How you advance your thinking — the engine that drives cognition forward

Adversarial Socratic Iterative Narrative Pattern +12 more
D3

Direction

Where your thinking goes — the trajectory of your cognitive process

Divergent Convergent Lateral Abstractive Subtractive
D4

Medium

How you externalize thought — the bridge between mind and world

Voice Writing Diagram Prototype Code
D5

Logical Form

How you reason — the structure of your inferential process

Deductive Inductive Abductive Analogical

3 Skills

Profile, translate, and bridge — a complete cognitive toolkit

/thinking-profile

Thinking Profile

15 scenario-based questions with adaptive deepening to map your cognitive style across all 5 dimensions. Includes gap analysis between how you think internally (D1) and how you externalize (D4). Saves to memory for persistent adaptation.

Fernyhough 2016 · Kahneman 2011 · Clark & Chalmers 1998
/thinking-translator

Thinking Translator

Reformulates your natural prompts into optimized LLM format based on your profile. Turns vague intuitions into structured queries, spatial thinking into textual prompts, adversarial instincts into productive challenges. Minimizes information loss.

Clark & Chalmers 1998 · Lakoff & Johnson 1980 · Hofstadter 2013
/thinking-bridge

Thinking Bridge

Takes a message and reformulates it for someone with a different cognitive profile. Not simplifying — translating between two ways of thinking. Reduces information loss at every translation boundary for cross-team communication.

Hutchins 1995 · Pickering & Garrod 2004 · De Bono 1985

Gap Analysis: D1 vs D4

When your cognitive channel and externalization medium differ, information is lost in translation. The gap is often the most actionable insight.

Internal (D1) External (D4) Gap Type Level Compensation
Visuo-spatial Voice / Writing visual_to_verbal HIGH Use spatial metaphors, describe the diagram in your mind before arguing
Somatic Voice / Writing somatic_to_verbal HIGH Translate feelings into scales: "from 1 to 10, how convinced am I"
Somatic Code / Formal somatic_to_formal HIGH First turn the feeling into words, then formalize the words
Auditory Writing sonic_to_writing MED-HIGH Write the way you would speak, then structure it afterward
Verbal Diagram verbal_to_diagram MEDIUM Start from an ordered list, then transform it into a diagram
Abstract Voice abstract_to_voice MEDIUM Prepare a mental outline before speaking, use bridge phrases
Verbal Writing verbal_to_writing LOW Write fast, revise later — capture the flow first
Visuo-spatial Diagram visual_to_diagram NONE Natural alignment — focus on making diagrams readable for others
Verbal Voice verbal_to_voice NONE Natural alignment — focus on structuring speech for audience

Scientific Foundation

Built on 137 peer-reviewed papers across neuroscience, cognitive psychology, and philosophy of mind

D1

The Voices Within: The History and Science of How We Talk to Ourselves

Fernyhough, C. (2016) — Foundational work on inner speech as condensed, fragmented internal dialogue. Central to the verbal-internal channel.

D1

Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate

Kosslyn, S. M. (1994) — Demonstrates that mental images activate primary visual cortex, establishing the neurological basis of visual-spatial thinking.

D1

Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain

Damasio, A. R. (1994) — Somatic marker hypothesis: bodily feelings guide decision-making and constitute a genuine cognitive channel.

D1 · D2

Thinking, Fast and Slow

Kahneman, D. (2011) — System 1/System 2 framework. System 2 (slow, deliberate thinking) is often verbal. Foundational for reasoning strategies.

D1

The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience

Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. & Rosch, E. (1991) — Foundational text for embodied cognition: thinking passes through the body.

D1

Lives without imagery — Congenital aphantasia

Zeman, A., Dewar, M. & Della Sala, S. (2015) — First formal characterization of aphantasia, defining one extreme of the visual-spatial channel.

D2

New Think: The Use of Lateral Thinking

De Bono, E. (1967) — Lateral thinking as a deliberate cognitive strategy for changing frames and finding unexpected angles.

D2

The Structure of Intellect

Guilford, J. P. (1956) — Distinguishes convergent from divergent production, establishing direction as a measurable cognitive dimension.

D2 · D5

Structure-mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy

Gentner, D. (1983) — Systematic analysis of analogical reasoning as structural alignment between domains.

D4

The Extended Mind

Clark, A. & Chalmers, D. (1998) — Cognition extends beyond the skull into tools, notebooks, and external media. Core theory for D4.

D4

Hearing Gesture: How Our Hands Help Us Think

Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003) — Gestures actively influence and shape cognitive processes, not mere accompaniment to thought.

D5

Harvard Lectures on Pragmatism

Peirce, C. S. (1903) — Original formulation of abductive reasoning as inference to the best explanation. Foundation for D5.

D2 · D5

Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking

Hofstadter, D. & Sander, E. (2013) — Analogy as the core mechanism of cognition, not a rhetorical device.

Bridge

Cognition in the Wild

Hutchins, E. (1995) — Distributed cognition: information is lost at every translation boundary when two minds communicate.

Bridge

Toward a Mechanistic Psychology of Dialogue

Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2004) — Interactive alignment theory: successful communication requires converging mental representations.

Full list of 137 references available in the interactive web questionnaire.

Installation

Option 1 — Clone & Copy

git clone https://github.com/fullo/claude-thinking-habit.git
cp -r claude-thinking-habit/skills/* ~/.claude/skills/

Option 2 — Claude Marketplace

claude plugin marketplace add fullo/claude-plugins-marketplace

claude plugin install thinking-habit@fullo-plugins

Compatibility

Claude Code Cursor Windsurf Cline

Works with any tool that supports the Agent Skills format. Requires memory system for profile persistence.

Usage

Trigger skills with slash commands or natural language

/thinking-profile
profile my thinking
discover my cognitive style
how do I think?
/thinking-translator "I feel like the auth flow
has a timing issue but I can't pinpoint it"
translate my thinking into a better prompt
/thinking-bridge "translate this technical
explanation for a visual thinker"
bridge this message for someone who
thinks in stories and examples
profila il mio pensiero
traduci il mio pensiero